TIME FOR CHANGE MOVIE HOW TO
TIME FOR CHANGE MOVIE MOVIE

These are well documented deficiencies. For example, after the Fukushima accident, as NRC Chairman I was under no pressure to shut down nuclear reactors due to radiophobia,' Jaczko told CNBC.Īnother problem is the length of time it takes to build nuclear reactors. 'The primary problems are cost competitiveness, operational ineffectiveness, engineering weakness, managerial incompetence, and design mistakes. 'As with most nuclear fables these days, the film establishes the strawman argument that nuclear is an underutilized technology because people are afraid of nuclear power and confuse it with nuclear bombs: 'Once we get over our radiation fear, nuclear will thrive and solve climate change.' This isn't the main or even a significant problem with nuclear power,' Jaczko told CNBC. Instead, nuclear energy is expensive and has been managed poorly. Jaczko says fear of accidents is not the primary reason nuclear energy is not more widespread today. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and author of Confessions of a Rogue Nuclear Regulator, told CNBC. 'Oliver Stone's 'Nuclear Now' was another disappointing myth creation falsely casting blame for nuclear power's impotence on radiophobia and baselessly ignoring truths about climate saving alternatives,' Gregory Jaczko, former chair of the U. Stone knew the film will be criticized because he's making a bold statement, and indeed it has been. Kennedy, 'JFK Revisited: Through the Looking Glass,' also came out in the meantime. Stone's memoir, 'Chasing the Light,' and his controversial second look at the assassination of John F.

TIME FOR CHANGE MOVIE MOVIE

Stone was working on 'Nuclear Now' for about three years, though he was not working exclusively on the movie in that time. 'You can't just stay in the green backyard in the United States, and do green things, like ovens and cars.' We have to go wide - you have to go to big mass crowd shots - China, India - to give you a sense of what's coming,' Stone told CNBC. 'One of the things this film I hope achieves is to give you a sense of scale. Stone says a goal of his documentary is communicating the scale of energy demand now and how much more electricity will be demanded in the future as climate change mitigation strategies electrify many processes, and as energy demand grows from countries like India and China. That's the highest percentage since 2012, according to Gallup. 'The majority of people actually support nuclear energy, but the people who don't support it are very loud and very scared and it draws a lot of attention,' Goldstein told CNBC.Īmericans' perspective of nuclear energy fluctuates and has been generally increasing in the last decade, according to a recent poll from Gallup showing 55% percent of Americans either strongly or somewhat favor using nuclear energy as a way to provide electricity. But watching a movie in a collective situation gives people an opportunity to talk to other people about nuclear energy and conversation is critical, Goldstein said. 'Everybody thinks everybody else thinks it's bad,' Goldstein says of people's perception of nuclear energy. In the film, which Stone narrates, he says he was anti-nuclear because he generally absorbed the environmentalist anti-nuclear agenda that has been spread for generations.

In the movie, Stone presents a case that the beneficial potential of nuclear energy has not been reached because society conflated its collective fear of nuclear bombs with nuclear energy.

Follow the history into the present: What went wrong? What could go right?' 'I didn't realize it was going to be so tough to pull something like this off,' Stone said, because there is no single main character for the documentary.

TIME FOR CHANGE MOVIE HOW TO

'This is a simple, practical, understandable argument for how to solve climate change from nuclear energy,' Stone told CNBC on Friday. He was struck by both the review and the book. He started reading about climate change, including a review of the book 'A Bright Future: How Some Countries Have Solved Climate Change and the Rest Can Follow' by Joshua S. Stone's interest in climate change began when he saw Al Gore's film, 'An Inconvenient Truth,' and was disturbed. The movie had a special screening at the World Economic Forum in Davos earlier in January, opened in New York and Los Angeles this weekend, and is opening in theaters nationally starting Monday. People ought to be more afraid of climate change than nuclear energy, the movie argues. Personal Loans for 670 Credit Score or Lower Personal Loans for 580 Credit Score or Lower Best Debt Consolidation Loans for Bad Credit

Time for change movie